As discussions are underway at the European Learning & Teaching Forum, EUA’s Tia Loukkola gives an overview of the extensive work taking place in the field, including reports, lessons learnt by EUA members and what the Bologna Process can bring to the field.
For the past twenty years, the Bologna Process has provided a framework for European collaboration in higher education by promoting common degree structures and approaches to quality assurance, recognition and credit allocations, among others. The Paris Ministerial Communiqué published last May identifies “cooperation in innovative learning and teaching practices as another hallmark of the EHEA”. Later this month, an advisory group on learning and teaching set up by the Bologna Follow-up Group will start its work to explore how the Process can take this commitment forward.
This week’s European Learning & Teaching Forum organised by EUA and hosted by the University of Warsaw in Poland will discuss this and many other topics showcasing the existing practices and work done by the sector thus far.
Importantly, EUA’s Trends 2018 study found that there is an increased level of attention paid to learning and teaching both at national and institutional levels and that there is strong convergence in this development across Europe. The work of EUA’s Learning & Teaching Thematic Peer Groups confirm these two findings.
The evidence gathered though these activities shows that universities are adopting a strategic and institution-wide approach to developing learning and teaching, setting up structures that aim to provide support to staff to develop their competences. Measures towards student-centred learning are being introduced and growing attention is being paid to both quality of learning process as well as learning outcomes. The thematic peer group reports that will serve as a backdrop for some workshops in the Forum and several papers that will be presented during the break-out sessions will bare evidence of these developments.
At the same time, another EUA report from last December shows that many countries in Europe have set up national initiatives aiming to encourage, incentive and support higher education institutions to engage in this line of work. The study found that these national initiatives can indeed play an important role in promoting teaching enhancement, but that in the majority of cases the institutional initiatives remain most effective.
With all this already ongoing, what kind of added value can European level activities bring? First, feedback from universities participating in various EUA learning and teaching activities in recent years shows that participants have found the exchange of experiences and practices across the systems to be rewarding and thought-provoking and have been encouraged to explore new practices also in their own universities.
Second, the feasibility study on how teaching enhancement can be promoted in the most efficient manner at the European level, launched at the Forum, stresses that the European approaches have the potential to “seek to synergise and collaborate with already existing national and institutional initiatives, facilitating exchange and collaboration among them.” The study further notes the value they have for institutions and teachers in countries that have no national initiatives.
In the field of learning and teaching, universities have taken the lead in developing a European dimension. EUA looks forward to playing an active role in ensuring the additional value that the Bologna Process can bring to the debate. This will go hand-in-hand with the lessons learnt by our members and the discussions taking place at what is now the second edition of the European Learning & Teaching Forum.
“Expert Voices” is an online platform featuring original commentary and analysis on the higher education and research sector in Europe. It offers EUA experts, members and partners the opportunity to share their expertise and perspectives in an interactive and flexible exchange on key topics in the field.
All views expressed in these articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of EUA.
The University of Jyväskylä in Finland is redefining the role of language and communication skills in curriculum development and aiming to educate multilingual academic professionals. A university-wide strategic development plan creates a completely new, multilingual structure for language and communication studies. As Marja-Leena Laakso and Peppi Taalas tell us, this brings together different languages and combines content and language expertise in the curriculum design.
Read moreResearch-based education is happening in Europe, but there are clear challenges with how it is defined and understood. Bjørn Stensaker from the University of Oslo breaks down the topic and makes some proposals on how to truly unite research and education.
Read moreStudent-centered and active learning are a necessity for European universities to remain relevant to young people and society. Cecilia Christersson and Patricia Staaf of Malmö University discuss the need for further European collaboration in education, as well as in research on education and active learning.
Read moreA higher education institution’s graduates reflect the achievement of intended learning outcomes as well as successful learning and teaching practices. Jurgita Vizgirdaite from the Kaunas University of Technology discusses challenges in the assessment of learning outcomes and shares recommendations and good practices from her university.
Read moreThe relationship between higher education institutions and society, as well as between learning and teaching, is evolving. This is driven by the changing ways in which students learn, different types of interaction in the classroom, and continuous adaptation to new developments and research. Romiță Iucu from the University of Bucharest examines this evolution in higher education and advocates for a new academic professional identity to transform careers.
Read moreHigher education institutions have been and are investing in finding a better balance between the valorisation of teaching and research. The example of KU Leuven, in Belgium, shows that even though an institution puts a lot of effort in honouring teaching in an appreciative way, it may not be experienced that way by the academics. Saartje Creten, an educational developer at the university, explains why engaging with other European higher education institutions on these matters proves that, while investing in the valorisation of teaching at the institutional level is indispensable, it is complementary and useful to look into the topic beyond the boundaries of one’s own institution.
Read moreThe need to better professionalise academic teaching careers is now on the agenda of more and more universities in Europe. Iwona Maciejowska from Jagiellonian University explains why these universities face many challenges and offers a proposal on the first steps to take.
Read more