The European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes was approved by the ministers of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) in 2015. Since then, research on its implementation has primarily focused on legal barriers and challenges posed by national external quality assurance practices.

Case studies and examples of promising practice have provided valuable insights into the practical difficulties encountered by QA agencies and higher education institutions during external QA reviews conducted using the European Approach. However, comparatively little attention has been paid to the outcomes of these reviews. This paper seeks to address this gap by shifting the focus to the results of these evaluations. In the spirit of ESG 3.4 on thematic analysis, this study systematically compares reports available in English and listed as currently valid in June 2025 on the Database for External Quality Assurance Results (DEQAR). The analysis is structured around the standards of the European Approach to identify recurring challenges that joint programmes face in their design, organisation, implementation, and quality assurance. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview that supports higher education institutions already engaged in joint programmes or planning to launch them. Additionally, it offers insights that may inform the ongoing development of the European Degree (Label) and the revision of the European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes.

This paper was presented at EQAF and reflects the views of the named authors only.

ISSN: 1375-3797

A thematic analysis of European Approach Joint Programme reviews

Beate Treml
TAGS

More related content